Home Page: Meeting Minutes
|
December 16, 2010 Door County Tourism Zone Commission Meeting - Minutes
DOOR COUNTY ZONE COMMISSION
Tourism Zone Commission & Executive Committee
Minutes of December 16, 2010 – 9:00 a.m.
Nasewaupee Town Hall, Nasewaupee
Committee Members Present by Roll Call: Bob Kufrin, Mary Boston, Bryan Nelson, Jeff Larson, Dick Skare, Bob Starr, Bill Weddig, Mike Johnson, Diane Jacobson, Pauline Cyrus, Little Bit LeClair, Tom Olsen, Chuck Tice, Richard Briggs
Excused: Sandy D’Amico, Nancy Goss, Carol Stayton, Nora Zacek
Absent: Jennifer Laughlin, Dave Holtz, Deb Jeanquart
Also in Attendance: Jack Moneypenny, Jon Jarosh, Mary Denis, Sally Everhardus/Door County Visitor Bureau; Dianne Lensert/Kerber Rose & Assoc.; Kathy Kirkland/Administrative Assistant; Paige Funkhouser/SBAA Coordinator; Todd Trimberger/Sturgeon Bay Visitor Center
Call to Order
Chair Bob Kufrin called the meeting to order at 9:05 a.m. The Strategic Conversation and Marketing from the Door County Visitor Bureau will come earlier in the agenda.
Approval of the Agenda
Nelson moved and Tice seconded to approve the agenda as amended.
Approval of November 18 and December 9 Executive Committee Minutes
LeClair noted changes on pg 1, line 13 (strike seconded “audited”), line 35 (strike “can’t), pg 3 line 12 (2010 instead of 2001), and pg 4 line 55 (strike “we”…just “deal with”). Nelson moved and Weddig seconded to approve the November 18 minutes as corrected. All ayes. For the December 9 minutes, Kufrin asked if the minutes for Executive Committee provide enough about what’s being discussed so the other commissioners are informed. Consensus that they do. The December 9th meeting was a review of the DCVB Strategic Conversation to make a recommendation to the full Commission. Nelson noted pg 2, line 11 (“deliver” instead of “delivery”). Starr moved and Nelson seconded to approve the December 9 minutes as corrected. All ayes.
DCVB on Strategic Conversation
Moneypenny everything is Strategic Conversation is laid out in depth. He handed out a PowerPoint presentation as a synopsis. Tourism is one of three economic generators in Door County. This is the third year of the three-year plan. They had five main goals to reach by the end of the three years, and while some strategies and tactics have changed, the main plan has not. One goal was national accreditation by the Destination Marketing Association International (DMAI), and last Thursday, they received notice that DCVB is now one of the 121 DMAI members worldwide. There are 40 mandatory thresholds and 30 voluntary thresholds they had to meet, and the DCVB’s Everhardus was instrumental in meeting those. The Brand Promise has been pared down to “Relaxing, Restorative, Maritime Experience.” It’s an internal message. On the page with Destination Lifecycles, Everhardus had seen one through DMAI, and it shows the benchmarks from the early days through where we are today. The “Who, Why, How” definitions WHO: the DCVB’s public policy, stressing the importance of the DCVB to stakeholders, an educational phase: Room Tax Task Force, formulation of the TZC, adding municipalities, dues/brand/implementation/annual audit. WHY: Promoting deeper understanding of how we position ourselves within the industry. It’s time to talk again about how we promote ourselves within the industry and help tourism-related businesses. HOW: The DCVB upgraded technology at various visitor centers around the county, got uniform signage, began the CTA program on customer service to exceed expectations. Instituted the CMF fund/coordinator. The Tourism Breakfast is part of this phase. He said if we do nothing from here on, we’ll start to decline; we have to look forward to the next phase to continue the arc.
Three-year goals are national brand marketing/economic impact, an integration and unification countywide to renew all 19 contracts by May 2011, increasing room nights, a countywide bike plan, build tourism. The Cherryland Airport expansion will be important. It’s vital to keep current on what’s happening in the industry; we shouldn’t have to be questioned by anyone. This includes keeping up within the State as well, taking a leadership role in tourism on a State level.
Denise said the DCVB positions Door County as a unique offering to regional and national target groups. They have four-season regional campaigns, targeting based on demographics they track with research. They look for niche markets such as outdoor enthusiasts, weddings, children, and now they’re looking at couples with older children. They’re targeting 35+ adult with higher income but can’t forget the 20- and 30-year-olds. They’re targeting ZIP codes within a five-hour drive. Each strategy has action steps. In 2011, they’ll be marketing to cultural heritage, moving into a mobile website by the first quarter of 2011. They’re adding itineraries, guest book, etc., on the website to build content. Social media will continue, member blogs, YouTube, four-minute videos online soon. They’ll continue with group tours, package tours, sending out leads to members for meeting planners. They have logo wear coming with the catchphrase and the DCVB logo, which will be made available to other information centers’ staff (seasonally adjusted) by end of 2011. They’ll research more consumer research to gather information and the costs of implementing that.
Occupancy is the No. 1 measurement. They’re hoping to increase occupancy by 1% in 2011 and increase web visits by 5%. The ad campaigns will generate quarterly reports. There are eight measurements for website, and they’ll be doing data cleansing of about 10,000 names to cull down to the best of the database and revisit the others later. They’ll take measurements of social media, send out leads to hotels, and continue meet-and-greet for the motor coach industry (giving gifts at the Welcome Center and having the tour planners fill out itineraries).
Jarosh said the DCVB will continue to work with Geiger to bring increased awareness through travel writers. They have ongoing journalist communication through press releases, the Midwest Travel Association and the Society of American Travel Writers. The photo library is increasing, as are the Explore the Door travel podcasts which will be leveraged into the mobile site, an upgraded video player that can play on iPads and non-Flash-technology sites. Promotional video footage, B-roll such as the aerial flyover, and in 2011, they’ll get an aerial of fall footage. They will host 60 travel journalists on 5 trips in 2011. The goal is to increase ad value by 4% and increase impressions by 6%, and increase publicity value (through Cision) by 10% in 2011. They’ll aim for 3% increase in Explore the Door and a high-def fall image library.
Everhardus said the biggest project this year was the Welcome Center, 60,000 visitors this year. In 2011, they’ll refresh landscaping, open up the south as a picnic area. Customer feedback will continue.
Denis said they’ll strengthen local partnerships, communicate to municipalities about value of tourism and importance of the DCVB. They’ll analyze the 2010 brochure sent to all residents; this year, it could be a series of postcards leading up to the National Tourism Breakfast.
Moneypenny said that the State Dept. of Tourism hired Geiger & Assoc. for three press trips statewide (Great River Road, Culinary, and one in Bayfield). He hopes for a state-funded trip for Door County. They look to renew the Intergovernmental Agreement by all 19 municipalities by May at the latest so they can start planning in June/July for 2012. The DCVB Board members reflect the municipalities geographically. They may recruit a Board member and a Commissioner to talk to individual community boards. They’ll also be articulating the next CMF strategies (Moneypenny handed out a new page for CMF for the Strategic Conversation), which they’ll present to their Board in February. It’ll be the next generation and it will have a different look: less money in the pot, stricter guidelines on how it can be spent, and changes over time (perhaps a three-year sunset, cannot be in perpetuity). It should review every three years so people can plan for it. For its Membership Strategy, they’re focusing on getting new members. First year, the goal was 100 new members, and they got 80. They lose about 70 people a year who do not renew. They are going into “maintenance mode,” with an emphasis on retention, servicing current members and educating on what’s available to them. Many members don’t have their InnLine page, and it’s a great opportunity with a photo and copy. The focus going forward is contacting everyone and helping them put together the base page.
Denis reiterated the four-season marketing. They’re increasing Nature of Romance (December thru March), Festival of Blossoms now has packages, will revisit Kingdom So Delicious, Holidays/Holly Nights. They activity guides will promote spring/winter activities. They’re surveying lodging about mid-week, in-season packaging. The Visitor Guide will have new format, lots of photos, less editorial. It will reflect the feel of the advertising campaign. They have a 10% goal of increasing seasonal booking in 2011. The $25 seasonal gift certificates from DCVB will give add-on value, track how many gift cards given out to lodging. With no charge to lodging, they’ll send out a general postcard to the DCVB mailing list about packages specific to their properties.
Moneypenny said outreach to members includes the Visitor Guide, advertising. They’re making their members aware of printed and online versions. The 2011 Visitor Guide goes on press tonight and delivery starts the first week of January. The ads went up in price this year but they maintained same number of ads, surpassing their goal with $40,000 in ad sales in the book. They’re printing 250,000 again this year. They’re doing resource development for the countywide bike plan, Cherryland Airport expansion, WiFi and cellular availability/clarity, local initiatives.
Denis said they increased the budget by 3% in 2011. They’ll continue to explore sponsorships/partnerships, but they have to be careful about aligning with people. Moneypenny said they’re offering quarterly direct withdrawal for membership payments now; it’s $350/year. It’s a Make the Most of your Membership overhaul this year. They’ll do a survey in the first half of 2011 with three educational programs/mixers throughout the year. They’ll do partnering with the DCEDC on one venture.
Jarosh attended industry conventions/seminars, continues industry subscriptions/memberships, serves on committees such as the Wisconsin Association of Convention Visitors Bureau, Circle Wisconsin, Coastal Byway, Triathlon, etc. They’ll continue PR but also in-county PR. Their goal is to distribute a minimum of one PR release a month.
Denis mentioned developing a Marketing Crisis Fund for events such as gas shortage or drought, etc. They can go to their Executive Committee and announce that Door County is still open, expectations and so on.
Everhardus mentioned again that DMAI was achieved, giving them a framework toward organizational excellence. She attended a CTA summit recently; all other CTAs have a plateau in the second year (they had a 40% renewal rate with last year’s trainees with 300 CTAs certified in Door County. They attend Legislative Day every other year (will be 2011), along with the DCEDC and county government. They lost their summer intern so they’ll be training new Visitor Info Specialists (they have a handbook in place). They have continuous staff training, online training on how to program Excel, Word, SharePoint for web/workflow platform. They even have an annual maintenance calendar for the Center and will be doing a 20-year capital expenditure plan for large maintenance. They’re continuing facility upgrades, carpeting upstairs, repainting. They’re doing a study on when people use the lobby; most months, a live person talks to more than 90% of people who come through the lobby. Flexible staffing is the key (4-6 p.m.).
Denis revealed the Visitor Guide cover, which focuses on silent sports, kayaking, emotions.
Skare asked about whether the DCVB has a blueprint or something they present to individual townships about re-upping with the Intergovernmental Agreement. Kufrin said the Sister Bay template resolution was sent out. Moneypenny said the goal in January is to see who hasn’t signed it yet and find out what the issues might be. Skare noted they all have to sign the same agreement, and as staffs change, we have to remind people not to change the Agreement.
Kufrin asked for questions about the DCVB budget, membership budget, Strategic Conversation. Starr said as he’s reading through, he gets the impression we don’t want children in Door County. Moneypenny said the brand promise is not a public statement. There are niche marketing strategies, attracting people with older children (Denis noted they have imaging with younger children and will be doing imaging with older children/young adults). Starr asked if there’s a competition with Wisconsin Dells. Denis said no, but The Dells is one of Top 5 from a consumer POV. Door County has intergenerational, family time activities. Starr noted the bike path system as a new type of amenity for a new element of visitor. Denis said the Murdoch consulting firm study three years ago was the basis if the DCVB’s first three-year plan. Kufrin noted that the Task Force was funded independently. Moneypenny said the three-year plan was internal; most agencies do a one-year plan. Denis said some marketing principles/demographics were done by Believable Brands and Don Anderson as a base of information. Starr asked if, at the end of the three-year term in 2011; during the year, they will be looking at next three years. Moneypenny said yes, they’ll follow the same model for next three years because the primary goals aren’t changing. Starr asked if the demographics have changed because of the economy. Denis said just because it’s an aging population; we have to bring in the younger generation. Visits are two or two-and-a-half days, but planning is within a week of the visit, due to the economy, and people are spending a little less. Everhardus stated that if you go to DCVB.org, the Brooks and Murdoch studies are online. Starr asked Jarosh to give an example of press trips or themed press trips. Jarosh said it depends on the time of year. Basically, they’re here three or four nights, they move them around logistically with no more than three at a lodging property. The first day is an overview, all do similar things. The rest of the time, they allow journalist to pick what they want to do. They don’t do bus tours; they set up activity tracks such as outdoor recreation, shopping, arts, culinary and each can pick a track. All is based on each journalist’s editorial needs.
Boston commented that she and her husband took the CTA program, and she urges everyone to take the time, send employees. The materials are interesting, it’s a well-done class. It’s not just for lodging. Their class had kayak rentals, Door Shakespeare, bartender, etc. It’s a new understanding of what Door County has to offer.
Kufrin challenged the commissioners to take this presentation or a larger presentation to their respective boards; if there are questions, involve Moneypenny and staff for additional feedback. You can’t assume local municipalities understand where the money is being spent. Make sure municipalities and local business associations are members of the DCVB. There’s a disconnect, and the Zone represents them to reconnect with information. Larson arrived.
Tice moved and Skare seconded to accept the DCVB Strategic Conversation and 2011 budget. All ayes.
Report from Administrative Assistant on Current Activities, Projects & Issues Associated with Permitting New Members
Kirkland reported that there are several properties that could go to collections, to be decided in Closed Session. There are still questions and challenges with filing online, but most of that seems to be worked out. The list of lates hasn’t been fully updated due to high October lodging, but it hasn’t changed much from last month. There are about 70 “no report” letters going out for October’s submissions. Kirkland presented a scenario for possible health insurance addition and recommended that the Commission consider that when making any 2011 budget decisions re: her review and the costs to The Zone of Wisconsin insurance, including a cut in her hours to make it more equitable. There were no new permit applications issued in the past month; she’ll begin looking online for 2011 offerings.
Report by the Door County Visitor Bureau on Marketing Efforts
With Circle Wisconsin, the DCVB tracked 175 room nights for motor coach for the future. They’ve had meetings with reunion/wedding planners this past month. Kufrin asked if they’re using same analysis tool from 2009 to 2010. Yes. They look at Google Analytics and SmartStats but haven’t made a decision on which program to use. In January, they may run parallel reports from the last three years to show differences. Google has a better methodology but they can’t just change over. They’ll likely track them together for a year.
Nelson asked about the difference between Advertising Gross Impressions and the decrease from previous year (YTD totals) and Media Marketing Impressions up from 2009. Media Marketing is PR, Advertising Gross Impressions is what the DCVB paid for. Denis noted that they had many small banners on websites last year so there were more impressions; this year, it’ll be half- or full-page ads. AVE is a big bump up from last year.
Kufrin asked if 2008 will drop off the DCVB reports in 2011. Moneypenny said yes, they’ll run three years on the reports. Starr moved and Boston seconded to accept the DCVB report. All ayes.
Discussion of Current Comparatible Occupancy Numbers for 2009
Lensert said October was up 9.3% from 2009, even without lates. Lates for September bring up September by 5%. We’re also up YTD. October this year surpassed last year’s September. Kufrin had a number of charts and graphs to present information visually. The numbers for the years didn’t reflect lates/prior year collections, so he needs to spread about $30,000 to $40,000 across the 12-month numbers to reflect all collected; he’ll do so for January. Not consequential, but for example, 2009 is $3,025,000 on his charts and should be $3,051,000. The goal is to show all collections. The Executive Committee had asked about what’s happening in the shoulder season. The charts show 2008 to 2010, and the percentage in the shoulder seasons are going up.
Weddig sees potential in June and September; this year is proof. Is there a way to show how many lates are out there? Lensert said she knows there are but there’s no prediction about the numbers. Weddig noted that people should raise room rates, which is the difference: in October the ADR was $132 and compared to 2009 of $122 to $124. Rooms only went up 1,100 rooms but the rates went up. Kufrin noted there were discounts in March, too. It’s important for individual business associations to measure themselves against the county or local competition, data mine off this report. Weddig noted that Units Filled by Month is a reflection of marketing success and the economy increasing.
Consideration of Approving Reports and Payables plus Receipts to Date
Lensert said there’s nothing unusual in the checks to be issued. (Kirkland handed out the correct Checks list; the wrong one was sent in the packets.) LeClair moved and Larson seconded to approve Kerber Rose reports and payables. All ayes.
Report from Commissioners on Feedback from Local Boards on Recent Issues
None beyond what has already been discussed.
2011 Meetings
Kufrin asked if there’s any desire to change the meeting time or day for 2011. No consensus to do so. The full Commission meetings are February 17, April 21, June 16, August 18, October 20, and December 15. Kufrin asked for volunteers to host the full meetings; in-between Executive Committee meetings will continue to be held at the Kerber Rose offices. It was determined: Gibraltar Fire Station or Town Hall/Feb, Sturgeon Bay/April, Jacksonport Town Hall/June, Baileys Harbor/August, Village of Egg Harbor (Bertschinger)/October, Sevastopol Town Hall/Dec. LeClair asked if April and Easter would be a problem; no one thought so.
TZC Budget 2011
The meeting packet included the Tourism Zone Commission budget for 2011, and the Executive Committee recommended approval of budget. Weddig moved to approve the 2011 budget; LeClair seconded. All ayes.
Consideration of Approving the Kerber Rose 2011 Engagement Letter
Kufrin felt the relationship is a good one and invaluable, especially Dianne Lensert, and it would be impossible to change over without great effort. Starr moved and Weddig seconded to approve the Kerber Rose 2011 Engagement Letter. Weddig noted it was probably the best decision made in the early days. All ayes.
Community Marketing Fund Program
Tourism Zone Chair Bob Kufrin noted that Jack Moneypenny will ask the Door County Visitor Bureau Board at its February 15, 2011, meeting to move forward with a modified form of Community Marketing Fund plan. The current CMF plan expires at the end of 2011 (instituted as a three-year sunset plan). Several letters have been received from local municipalities’ business councils and marketing entities in favor of continuing CMF past the end of 2011, citing enhancements to their marketing plans and what would be lacking if CMF were to alter greatly. There were several letters received from different business associations in favor of continuing CMF. Paige Funkhouser, representing the Sister Bay Advancement Association, was present Todd Trimberger had been present to speak on the issue but had to leave for a prior commitment before this issue was discussed. Paige noted that the SBAA has not written a formal letter, but she will speak to the issue. The SBAA Board is in discussions regarding exactly what they’re looking for from CMF. She stated that Sister Bay has significantly benefited from the CMF dollars, and the SBAA board is unanimous about the program’s continuation.
Kufrin asked if the Association can present specifics as to the dollars and expenditures from the CMF money in 2009 and 2010, and what plans the SBAA has for using 2011 dollars for advertising. Funkhouser said much of the CMF money to date has gone toward marketing but also refurbishing the website for better outreach and usability. They have developed a new logo and, on Tuesday night, the Village Board adopted the same logo for the Village. They use CMF funds to continue to brand and market Sister Bay. Their own funds have been used to run the local festivals and events; however, CMF money has been instrumental in marketing and advertising village events, which bring a great deal of money to the community and county. Funkhouser noted that governments and organizations are often reactive instead of proactive, and she would like to see the Sister Bay Village Board become even more committed to agreeing with the SBAA on the importance of continuing CMF.
Kufrin said that individual Commissioners should appear before or contact their municipal boards as soon as possible, in tandem with the local association, and to determine the local opinions on continuing the CMF. If any DCVB Board members live in the various communities, they should be invited to the local board meeting as well. Ultimately, the DCVB and its Board will decide the form and funding levels the CMF will take after 2011 and make a recommendation to the TZC. DCVB’s Jon Jarosh stated that the DCVB Board meetings are open meetings, and anyone can come. If the SBAA or other entities wanted to appear before the DCVB Board, they should ask to be on the January 18, 2011, agenda for the meeting in Egg Harbor. Kufrin hopes part of the associations’ presentations would be a detailed report on what CMF has accomplished on a local level and, if that money were to go away or be reduced, what would not be able to happen in the community locally.
Weddig noted that the downside the CMF sunset deal is that the municipalities could cut back on their own percentage of room tax allotted to business associations because CMF has been helping fund; however, as CMF dwindles or changes, the associations would suffer. Weddig is not in favor of phasing out CMF and perhaps the opposite should happen. He wouldn’t want to damage the local experience.
Jarosh reminded that CMF was started with the main goal of getting Sturgeon Bay into The Zone, and everyone knew that there was reduced funding over the three-year period and that it would end in December 2011.
Starr’s own impression was that the DCVB’s long-term goal is to phase out CMF and have the DCVB take over all marketing. Jarosh said it was never the DCVB’s intent to market for individual municipalities; their mandate is countywide marketing, which is why local community groups are so vital. Skare noted that their Fish Creek model, using municipal money plus CMF money, has revitalized the organization and motivated all of them—the model is a grassroots, bottom-up model that’s working. The alternative is top-down, but the DCVB cannot recreate all the organizations and have the same effectiveness. He felt it’s money well spent; further, many people will not volunteer for a countywide effort but they will for their own communities, so it’s critical to keep the local impetus. The individual associations are a good collaborative approach with the DCVB (that is, taking care of tourists who are already vis a vis getting them here, respectively).
Tice said the Commission should be taking its authority more seriously: If the Commission feels it’s important, we should make it clear to the DCVB that we want the CMF to continue in its current form. Kufrin said the challenge is to do it collaboratively; the local associations have to document the need and value. Starr asked if there are State requirements regarding how such money is to be used. Tice said room tax money is to be used for marketing toward overnight stays in the entire Zone and not a specific community. Nelson pointed out that Bruce Hill, as CMF coordinator, has been guiding local associations for use of the money.
Ultimately, Kufrin felt that whatever range of activities is funded by room tax dollars through the DCVB—as reflected in the DCVB marketing—should be the same categories that are appropriate for local associations. If it’s acceptable for the DCVB to use room tax money for all types of things, it should also be acceptable for the SBAA and others (utilities, etc.). We should hold everyone to the same standard; if locals are held to a higher standard, then the DCVB should be at the same standard. Currently, the approved DCVB Strategic Conversation for 2011 expects the CMF plan beyond 2011 will have stricter standards coupled with less funding. The municipalities could not use money for office upgrades, etc., only marketing; however, the entire plan is still in flux. Nelson said the message for each Commissioner is to contact the community association and ask them to be at the next DCVB Board meeting. The January DCVB Board Meeting is Tuesday, January 18, 3:30 p.m. at Bertschinger Center/Egg Harbor. Kufrin said those wishing to speak should contact Jack Moneypenny to appear on the agenda.
Kufrin would like to excerpt this part of the minutes for Moneypenny and the commissioners to relate them back to the local associations.
Consideration of Collection Agencies’ Contract Proposals to Pursue Compliance
The Executive Committee had spoken with both Associated Collection, Inc. and Valley Credit Services, and the Executive Committee would recommend Associated. Nelson stated they interviewed both representatives and felt that Associated is the more likely to become a good partner with us. He moved and Skare seconded to enter into an agreement with Associated Collection, Inc. All ayes.
Consider Motion to Convene into Closed Session Pursuant to Wisconsin State Statutes, Section 19.85(1)(a)(f) or (g) to consider enforcement action against Certain Businesses Regarding the Room Tax Permitting, Late Payments, and Reporting
Kufrin moved and Olsen seconded to move into Pursuant to Wisconsin State Statutes, Section 19.85(1)(a)(f) or (g) to consider enforcement action against Certain Businesses Regarding the Room Tax Permitting, Late Payments, and Reporting. All ayes from Boston, Nelson, Larson, Jacobson, Cyrus, Weddig, Skare, LeClair, Olsen, Tice, Kufrin, Starr, Briggs.
CLOSED SESSION
Consider a Motion to Reconvene into Open Session
Cyrus moved and Weddig seconded to reconvene into Open Session. All ayes from Boston, Nelson, Larson, Jacobson, Cyrus, Weddig, Skare, LeClair, Olsen, Tice, Kufrin, Starr, Briggs.
Consider a Motion to Take Action, if Required
Motion to take actions as discussed in Closed Session. All ayes from Boston, Nelson, Larson, Jacobson, Cyrus, Weddig, Skare, LeClair, Olsen, Tice, Kufrin, Starr, Briggs.
Adjournment
Tice moved and Boston seconded to adjourn. All ayes. Meeting adjourned at 12:40 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Kathy Kirkland
Administrative Assistant
Future Meetings
January 20 - Executive Committee/Kerber Rose, Sister Bay
February 17 - Gibraltar Fire Station (or Town Hall)
March 17 - Executive Committee/Kerber Rose, Sister Bay
April 21 - City of Sturgeon Bay/City Hall
May 19 - Executive Committee/Kerber Rose, Sister Bay
June 16 - Jacksonport Town Hall
July 21 - Executive Committee/Kerber Rose, Sister Bay
August 18 - Baileys Harbor Town Hall
September 15 - Executive Committee/Kerber Rose, Sister Bay
October 20 - Egg Harbor/Bertschinger Center
November 17 - Executive Committee/Kerber Rose, Sister Bay
December 15 - Sevastopol Town Hall
Archive:
April 19, 2012 Door County Tourism Zone Executive Committee Minutes
March 15, 2012 Door County Tourism Zone Meeting Minutes
February 16, 2012 Door County Tourism Zone Executive Committee Minutes
February 8, 2012 Door County Tourism Zone Executive Committee Minutes
January 19, 2012 Door County Tourism Zone Meeting Minutes
December 15, 2011 Door County Tourism Zone Executive Committee Minutes
November 17, 2011 Door County Tourism Zone Meeting Minutes
November 2, 2011 Door County Tourism Zone Executive Committee Minutes
October 20, 2011 Door County Tourism Zone Meeting Minutes
September 15, 2011 Door County Tourism Zone Executive Committee Minutes